Inflation was already elevated
Headline inflation reached 22.41% year-on-year in May, before the full price effects of the new policy mix could appear.
Nigeria removed the petrol subsidy and changed the operation of its foreign-exchange market within weeks. This interactive brief asks what happens when two reforms move through prices, public finances and households at the same time.

The timing matters. Closely spaced interventions complicate any attempt to isolate the effect of one reform from the other.
Headline inflation reached 22.41% year-on-year in May, before the full price effects of the new policy mix could appear.
The inauguration-day announcement immediately altered expectations and was followed by higher petrol prices.
The central bank announced operational changes centered on market-determined rates in the investors’ and exporters’ window.
Headline inflation rose from 22.79% in June to 28.92% in December, alongside other domestic and global pressures.
Change the policy environment to see a transparent, illustrative transmission model. It is a thinking tool—not a forecast.
Each control runs from weak or gradual to strong or rapid.
Relative intensity on a 0–100 scale; these are not estimated percentage changes.
When both price shocks are large and support is limited, the model flags strong near-term pressure on household budgets.
Model logic: fuel and FX adjustments raise price pressure; subsidy removal raises potential fiscal relief; targeted support reduces welfare strain but may use part of the available fiscal space.
The reforms can reinforce one another through overlapping routes. That interaction is the core empirical puzzle.
Higher petrol costs can travel through passenger fares, freight charges and the final price of goods.
A weaker currency can raise naira prices for machinery, medicine, fuel components and intermediate goods.
Announcements may change prices and contracts before official monthly indicators register the full shock.
Lower subsidy costs can create fiscal space, but realised gains depend on oil revenue, FX valuation and spending choices.
Food, mobility and energy costs matter most for households with little room to substitute or absorb shocks.
The combined effect may differ from simply adding two isolated effects, especially when exchange-rate movements amplify energy costs.
Inflation accelerated through the remainder of 2023. The pattern is descriptive; it does not, by itself, identify how much each reform caused.
The project can move beyond before-and-after comparison by explicitly modelling anticipation, interaction and dynamic responses.
Use event dates and higher-frequency series to test whether expectations shifted before measured policy implementation.
Trace responses over successive horizons without forcing every variable into one rigid dynamic structure.
Include the subsidy shock, FX shock and their interaction to test whether simultaneous reform produced amplification.
Did Nigeria’s simultaneous subsidy and foreign-exchange reforms generate a combined inflation response greater than the sum of their separate effects—and how quickly did that response reach households?